Skip to main content

Lamina vs Figma to code

Figma to code answers what it looks like. Lamina answers what states exist, who can transition, and what happens on failure.

Curated by Aryan Iyappan · Updated 2026-07-13

Who this comparison is for

You are in the right place if

  • Screens match Figma but checkout logic is wrong.
  • You use Figma MCP in Cursor and ship happy-path UI only.
  • Designers sign off on mocks while product rules live only in Slack threads.
  • Dev Mode gave you CSS but not hold lifecycle or role permissions.

Context

Figma remains the default design source for many teams. Figma MCP and codegen plugins close the gap between frame and component file. That handoff is visual. Product behavior (who may pay, when submit unlocks, what happens on hold expiry) rarely lives in Figma unless you maintain separate flow diagrams your agent never reads. Lamina puts behavior in the same repo as the implementation, in a format agents consume.

Common situations

Concrete cases from AI-shipping workflows. Each shows what the alternative handles and where a behavior contract helps.

Figma MCP session ships onboarding UI

Situation
Cursor pulls frame context from Figma MCP. Agent builds a complete partner onboarding form with Submit visible on step one.
What Figma to code does
Figma MCP supplies layout, typography, and component structure from frames.
What Lamina adds
implement.md lists stepped prerequisites and server-side gates. Verify walks partner persona before design sign-off.
Takeaway
Visual handoff does not imply behavioral handoff.

Pixel-perfect checkout, wrong pay rules

Situation
Checkout matches the Figma file. QA finds guests can pay without verified email.
What Figma to code does
Achieves visual parity with design specs.
What Lamina adds
run.yaml defines pay preconditions. fix.md from verify lists the gap explicitly for the agent.
Takeaway
Match Figma first if you want; spec behavior before you call the feature done.

Static marketing page from Figma

Situation
Single landing frame, no auth, checkout, or role-specific variants.
What Figma to code does
Figma to code is sufficient end to end.
What Lamina adds
Not needed until interactive product rules appear.
Takeaway
Static scope: skip behavior layer.

Comparison

Lamina vs Figma to code
DimensionFigma to codeLamina
Primary jobTranslate visual design into UI codeSpec product behavior first
Layer in stackDesign handoff / visual layerBehavior contract layer
Primary outputUI components from framesrun.yaml + implement.md
Writes app source?Yes, UI implementationNo
Behavior spec (states, flows, permissions)Visual specs only unless annotated separatelyStates, permissions, invariants
Durable in-repo artifactFigma file + generated code.lamina/ in git
Post-build verificationVisual diff to frames/lamina-verify persona walks
Repo and stack fitTeams with Figma in the loopAny repo; pairs with Figma MCP
Best whenPixel fidelity and design alignmentDomain rules, gates, multi-actor flows
When you don't need LaminaStatic pages with no product rulesFrame encodes all required behavior
Compose with Lamina?Implement UI from frames/lamina-design before implement from Figma output

Workflow

Lamina vs Figma to code: recommended workflow
StepFigma to codeLamina
1Design frames in Figma/lamina-design in parallel or first
2Figma MCP or export into repoimplement.md guides behavior rules
3Agent implements visual componentsAgent enforces contract transitions
4Design QA vs frames/lamina-verify on staging

When to use which

Lamina vs Figma to code: when to use each
SituationFigma to codeLamina
Design system component parityFigma handoffWhen component changes behavior
Multi-role booking productFigma for UI chromeRequired for rules
No Figma in workflowN/ALamina still applies

Worked example

Onboarding gate before submit. Figma can show a submit button on every onboarding step. Lamina specs when submit-for-review may unlock relative to Stripe, property, rooms, and policy completion. HavenStay verify caught submit available too early when only visual handoff was used.

HavenStay demo walkthrough

Frequently asked questions

I use Figma MCP. Do I still need Lamina?

Yes, when features have roles, gates, or illegal states Figma frames do not encode.

Should designers write Lamina contracts?

Designers can review run.yaml for flow accuracy. Developers or PMs usually run /lamina-design with the agent; designers stay authoritative on Figma.

Does Lamina replace Figma?

No. Lamina does not generate screens or replace design tools.

Comparisons map stack layers, repo artifacts, and HavenStay demo examples. Updated when major tools change positioning.

Install in one command.

A headless product-design skill for your AI coding agent. Then run the design → implement → verify loop on your next feature.

Apache-2.0 · open source. Star on GitHub if Lamina saves you a loop.

npx skills install aryaniyaps/lamina

Works with your coding agent

  • Cursor
  • Claude Code
  • Codex
  • Gemini
  • Pi
  • and more